The Red Monks of Brittany

The Knights Templar were traditionally known, here in Brittany, as the Red Monks. Their evil deeds and cruel reputation survived in the popular imagination long after their medieval heyday; cruel ghosts, condemned to forever wander the lonely places to atone for their terrible and abominable crimes.

Following the success of the First Crusade, a number of feudal domains were established in the Holy Land by European Christian knights. However, these realms lacked the full military resources necessary to maintain little more than a tenuous grip on their territories; most crusaders returned home after fulfilling their vows. Christian pilgrims to Jerusalem and the other holy sites therefore continued to remain subject to peril and attack.

Battle of Tyre
.

It was to alleviate the plight of these pilgrims that a band of French knights led by Hugh de Payns vowed to devote themselves to the pilgrims’ protection and to form a religious community for that purpose. Baldwin II, King of Jerusalem, was quick to grant them quarters in a wing of the royal palace, said to have been the site of the former Temple of Solomon, from which they took their name: The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Jesus Christ and of the Temple of Solomon, more popularly known as the Templar Knights.

To gain the support, supplies and manpower necessary to deliver on their vows, de Payns embarked on a major fund-raising tour of the kingdoms of western Europe in 1127. His efforts were well rewarded; the new order received significant donations and political backing from many of Europe’s most noble families and also secured the Church’s official sanction at the Council of Troyes in 1129. It was during this first European tour that the Templars received their first donations within the Duchy of Brittany; lands in the country of Retz.

In 1139, Pope Innocent II granted the order special privileges: the Templars were allowed to build their own oratories and were not required to pay tithes; they were also exempt from episcopal jurisdiction, being subject to the pope alone. This was also around the time that the Duke of Brittany, Conan III, whose father had fought in the First Crusade, ceded property to the Templars on the outskirts of the cities of Nantes and Rennes. The Duke also granted the order an exemption from taxes and awarded them lucrative market rights in Nantes.

The first Templar Grandmaster
.

The rule of the order was modelled after the Benedictine Rule, especially as applied by the Cistercians. Renouncing the world, the Templars swore an oath of poverty, chastity and obedience, just as the Cistercians and other monks did. Like other monks, the Templars heard the Divine Office and were expected to honour the fasts and vigils of the monastic calendar. They were also required to live in community but, unlike other monks, were not strictly cloistered nor were they expected to perform devotional reading.

The Templars were originally divided into two classes: knights and sergeants. The knights came from the aristocracy and were thus trained in the arts of war and generally assumed leadership positions in the order. Only the knights wore the Templars’ distinctive regalia of a white mantle emblazoned with a red cross. The sergeants, usually from lower social classes, served as both warriors and servants and dressed in black. A third class was eventually added, the chaplains, who were responsible for holding religious services, administering the sacraments and addressing the order’s spiritual needs.

With increased resources, the Templars swiftly expanded their remit in the Holy Land; from protecting the pilgrim trails, the order moved to staging a broader defence of the Crusader States, building and garrisoning castles and fortified settlements. Now a full military force, the Templars formed an important part of the military infrastructure of the Holy Land and gave much useful service in support of the Christian cause there.

Knights Templar cavalry charge
.

While the Templars were sometimes opposed by those who rejected the notion of a religious-military order, their growing wealth and influence was also criticised by other religious orders such as the Benedictines and the Cistercians. However, the order enjoyed the support of powerful secular leaders and the full protection of the Church whose anathemas struck against any who opposed them. For instance, in 1213, the Bishop of Nantes obliged the Lord of Clisson to compensate the Templars for the damages he caused them and for a murder committed in their cemetery; in 1222, the Lord of Assérac was excommunicated for having refused to release Templars detained in his prisons.

Over time, the Templars amassed great riches, thanks, in part, to the lordships, manors and estates gifted to the order by the nobility of France, England, Italy, Portugal and Spain. By the mid-12th century, the Templars boasted an extensive property portfolio scattered throughout western Europe and the Holy Land. Giving land and property rights to the order was seen as a pious duty that some benefactors hoped would help secure the salvation of their souls and those of their loved ones. In Brittany, Duke Conan IV donated dozens of properties and good lands which would form the nucleus of the Templar presence in the region.

Making good use of their extensive privileges, the Templars constructed hundreds of structures, including churches, castles, farms and even entire villages such as Vildé-Guingalan. While the full extent of the Templar domains in Brittany might never now be known for certain, documents suggest that they once had holdings in around a hundred Breton localities. Many local traditions represent them as prolific builders and they were sometimes even honoured with constructions that pre-dated the founding of the order. Indeed, since the 18th century revival in interest in the Templars, there is hardly an old church or ruined castle whose foundation the locals here did not attribute to the Templars.

A Knight Templar
.

Perhaps the most famous Breton ruin associated with the Templars is the 12th century octagonal tower of Montbran which was, for a time, thought built by the Romans. Dominating the Frémur valley, this strong tower might have been built to guard against Norman incursions into Brittany but was likely built to protect and control the ancient northern road that connected the east and west of Brittany and traffic headed to and from the great annual fair at nearby Pléboulle. Many Templar buildings were carefully sited near main traffic routes, coastal approaches or river crossings; all lucrative sources of revenue.

Initially, the Templars had eschewed the ties of the feudal hierarchy, wanting to remain free to answer the first call of the Holy Land but, over time, they accepted fiefs with all their charges. Their estate management eventually extended beyond simple farming; they cleared vast tracts of land in northern Brittany for growing cereals and breeding animals; they cultivated the vine and branched out into highly profitable processing activities such as producing wine and operating community ovens and mills. It is believed that they created, or at least promoted, great fairs and public markets such as those at Pléboulle and Les Biais.

Just as important as their vast country estates, a presence in major cities such as Nantes, Quimper and Saint Brieuc was vital to the order. Not only were these centres of trade and commerce where they could sell their goods or rent out their warehouses, they were also important communication hubs. The Templars’ military and political power allied with their broad geographic coverage allowed them to safely collect, store and transport goods and bullion across Europe and the Holy Land. Their international network of warehouses and secure transport links thus made them attractive as bankers to kings as well as to more humble pilgrims.

Templar possessions in Brittany
.

The fall of Acre, effectively the last crusader stronghold, in 1291 removed much of the Templars’ reason for being and the pope was keen to see the order merge with their great rivals, the Knights of the Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, better known as the Hospitallers. Having rejected the pope’s proposals, the order’s arrogance, great wealth and extensive landholdings inspired increased resentment towards them. While an ex-Templar had accused the order of blasphemy and immorality in 1305, it was on Friday 13 October 1307 that King Philip IV of France acted; ordering the arrest of every Templar in the country and the sequestration of their property.

The king accused the Templars of heresy and immorality; specific charges against them included idol worship (of a cat and a male head), homosexuality and numerous other errors of belief and practice. It was claimed that during the order’s initiation rite, the new member denied Christ three times, spat on the crucifix and was kissed on the base of the spine, on the navel, and on the mouth by the monk presiding over the ceremony. The charges, now generally recognized as without foundation, were seemingly calculated to stoke the contemporary fears of witchcraft.

The motives behind Philip IV’s desire to destroy the order are unclear; he may have feared their power and been motivated by a pious duty to destroy a heretical group or he may have seen an opportunity to seize their fabled wealth. Outside France, news of the charges levied against the Templars was greeted with incredulity, particularly in Brittany, England, Portugal and Aragon. However, the pope finally suppressed the order in March 1312 and the Templars’ property throughout Europe was slowly transferred to the Hospitallers or else confiscated by secular rulers. Knights who confessed and were reconciled to the Church were sent into retirement in the order’s former houses, which were now nominally run by the Hospitallers.

Saint Catherine Chapel in Lizio
On the pilgrim route to Compostela, the St-Catherine chapel in Lizio was said to have been built on the site of a Templar priory and contains this painting.

Here, as elsewhere, the Templars were arrested and their property sequestered but their downfall left little trace in the annals of Brittany, leading some to question the degree that each of the nine Breton bishoprics implemented the pope’s orders. One of the few claims made against the knights in Brittany alleged that, in Nantes, wheat from Templar warehouses was given to pigs rather than the poor. Sadly, only three depositions from Templars serving in Brittany at the time of the arrests have been preserved in the records of the papal commission sitting in Paris in 1310: each of the brothers attested that they had initially been heard in Poitiers where they had been absolved and reconciled to the Church.

A tradition of the 15th century records that when the French king’s men arrived in Nantes on 10 August 1308 to take possession of the Templar properties there, they were driven out of the city by a mob who declared that the Templar possessions did not belong to the king of France but to the Duke of Brittany and no other.

In Brittany, the Templars were popularly known as the Red Monks; a moniker unconnected with the colour of their costume but rather the dress of the Devil. Most local tradition here depicted them as ungodly; arrogant and debauched, leading a lifestyle that marked the public consciousness with once popular phrases such as “Drink like a Templar” or “Curse like a Templar”.

Templar Knight
.

Around the town of Guingamp, the Templars were said to have spied on the young girls in the washhouses and to kidnap those that took their fancy. Like many other characters whose lives were said to have been sullied by evil deeds, the Templars cannot find rest, even in death. In some areas, the people believed they saw the ghosts of Templars wandering at night, mounted on skeletal horses covered with dirty funeral shrouds. They pursued travellers, attacking young women whom they kidnapped and that were never seen again.

According to local legend, the ancient chapel of Trioubry, about 25km south of Rennes, was originally built by the Templars. It was reported that, one stormy evening, a man from a nearby village took shelter in the ruins of the chapel which was suddenly illuminated on all sides. Adjusting his eyes to the light, the man noticed the knave of the chapel was filled with skeletons, and a tall monk, dressed in red, began to bear down on him. The man rushed out into the night and having covered several hundred metres, he turned to see the red monk retrace his steps and disappear under the rocks of the hill. It was said that this red monk, a former Templar, returned every evening in search of sinners to share with them his torments in hell.

On Brittany’s north coast, the Château du Guildo was said to be visited each night by the restless spirits of Templars who wandered the castle ruins, their backs bent under a crushing burden. These souls were believed to have been condemned, as punishment for their crimes, to carry, for eternity, the weight of all that they had stolen in life. A local farmer, having counted his sheaves after harvest, found a hundred more the next day; he believed that the Templars had returned to him a part of what they had once stolen from his parents. Nearby, at Ploubalay, the Templars were held to have had such a bad reputation in the locality that the rectors of the neighbouring parishes rang bells to warn people to guard their livestock and their daughters when the knights were abroad.

Knights Templar in Brittany
.

Just 13km to the south, an old manor house in Quévert is said to be haunted by a Templar who walks slowly along the avenue, stopping fleetingly at the manor’s well before moving off quickly in all directions. It is believed that the well conceals a stash of gold once taken by the knight, who died without being able to return it.

Returning to the north coast, a reputed subterranean passage linking the Templar chapel outside Pléboulle to the old watchtower of Montbran, some 700 metres away, was said to be home to a knight who had redeemed his wicked ways while still a serving brother. Some people claimed, on the darkest of nights, to have seen the red monk at large, he having left his eternal retreat to walk again amongst men. His beard was said to be so long that, in order to walk without hindrance, he had to lift it over his shoulder. Often the old chapel was seen surrounded by strange lights; thought to be the spectres of the knight’s former companions come to beg him piteously to intercede for them.

Montbran Tower
.

It was said that near the tower of Montbran lay a Templar cemetery where the knights buried there were as tall as in the time Noah. Local legend claims that one of these knights kidnapped a Norman princess and imprisoned her in the tower, where she slowly died of grief. The knight, to keep a memory of his prize, cut off one of her hands. Every year, on the anniversary of her pitiful death, she emerges from her tomb and walks in the old cemetery to the plot where the knight was buried; she goes to claim her hand that the wicked Templar had ordered buried with him.

In Brittany, the unfavourable memory of the religious orders that once peppered the land was not confined to the Templars alone. Many old stories accuse other monks of kidnap and keeping women captive, sometimes even of murder. In Béré, it was said that a young girl entered the priory of Saint-Sauveur and never reappeared; it was rumoured that she had been slain and buried within the church. Her vengeful spirit returns to terrorise the land under the guise of the monster popularly known as the Beast of Béré.

Unlike priests, sorcery was rarely attributed to monks here but several tales about the Abbey of Notre-Dame de Boquen talk of spell casting and magical, crop-destroying, potions and even that one of the last priors was a levitating sorcerer able to foretell the future.

Three Red Monks
.

An old Breton ballad, The Three Red Monks, collected from the oral tradition in the 1830s tells of a young girl, Katelik Moal, abducted by three Templars near the town of Quimper. Taken to their commandery in nearby Locmaria, the girl was held captive and subjected to the most abominable outrages. Her torment endured for eight long months, at the end of which the knights resolved to rid themselves of young Katelik and the baby she now carried; as they had done before for seven other girls from the area. They decided to bury her under the high altar of the commandery chapel and dug a pit as Katelik begged for her life while a hailstorm raged outside. It was at that moment that a lone traveller seeking shelter noticed the lights burning in the church. Reaching the door, he looked through the keyhole and saw a bound Katelik thrown into the pit, pleading for the holy oil of baptism for her child.

Rushing to Quimper, the witness roused Bishop Morel who quickly agreed to attend the commandery in all haste. Once there, the bishop had the flagstones lifted and the ground under the high altar dug up; he wept as the lifeless forms of young Katelik, who had torn her breast to her heart, and her child, were uncovered. Faced with this appalling scene, the bishop fell to his knees. For three days and nights, dressed in only sackcloth, he remained bent in prayer bowed towards the cold earth, surrounded by all the Templars of the community. At the end of the third night, the body of the child began to move; he opened his eyes, got up and walked directly towards the three knights, declaring: “These are they!”

Justice was soon served; the three culprits were tried, found guilty and burned alive; their ashes scattered to the four winds. However, earthly punishment was seemingly considered insufficient because since that day, these knights were condemned to wander the roads of southern Brittany, where, according to tradition, they continued their vile activities, kidnapping children who were never seen again.

.

It is difficult to assign, with any degree of accuracy, a timeframe for the many legends surrounding the red monks in Brittany but it is unlikely that they really date from the medieval period; chroniclers from that time make little mention of them. The traditions recorded in the 17th century seem to have been more ambivalent than negative but in the 18th and 19th centuries, the Templars are nearly always popularly portrayed as evil, self-serving figures.

Much has been written about how quickly the Order of the Temple was eradicated and in Brittany there were many legends that tell of the suddenness of their demise. The manors and castles they owned around Moncontour were all said to have collapsed in one night. Likewise, in nearby Yffiniac, their commandery was held to have been completely destroyed in just one night, while the Templar contingents at La Baussaine and Carentoir were all believed to have been killed overnight.

Many believe that such legends are allegorical, as the order did effectively collapse in a single day. However, as with many of the myths surrounding the Templars, the truth is slightly separated from the folklore and it was not until May 1313 that the Breton assets of the order were properly transferred to the Hospitallers; a religious-military order of knighthood founded some twenty years before the Templars and whose successor bodies remain active to this day.

The seal of the Knights Templar
Templar Seal

Published by Bon Repos Gites

Enjoying life in Kalon Breizh - the Heart of Brittany.

117 thoughts on “The Red Monks of Brittany

    1. You are most welcome! I have seen that one on Netflix 😉 For an order that didn’t last 200 years, it seems to have attracted an aura that has evaded the other religious-military orders that were rife at the time.

      Like

  1. Always a well researched and informative fact, truth?, and myth in your posts. The Templar legends are indeed fascinating. I’m left wondering how they developed such advanced knowledge of building, farming and economics. Thank you as always for your wonderful posts.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. This is interesting. 🧐 When I was growing up, the impression I had of the Knights Templar was that they were spoilt, rich English boys who escaped boarding schools in France and, with strong religious conviction, rode off together to clang swords in other countries. Now I’m learning that they were considered as ne’er do wells at home, too? All right, I will read this again.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Thank you! The knights of the order were certainly from wealthy backgrounds and quite disconnected from the lives of everyday folk. In terms of nationalities, a quite diverse bunch but quite similar in upbringing and outlook! I hope you enjoy the read! 😉

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I really enjoyed reading this!!! Papal propaganda has done a number on a lot of lives…

    I’ve done research into two knightly orders — the Knights of St. Lazarus (leper knights) and Teutonic Knights and all that was for two novels; Martin of Gfenn, which is set in an actual commandery outside Zürich that was a community of Leper Knights in the mid-13th century and the other for Savior which is the story of a young man who ends up fighting in the Battle of La Forbie. Research into medieval times is, I think, a lot of fun and also frustrating. One of my friends in Zürich is a Swiss medievalist historian and he said, once, “Well you know, it was a long time ago.” 😀 That’s true and Europe wasn’t using paper at that time.

    I also think that even we, in the midst of our lives, don’t think there’s anything all that interesting about us and our institutions. Then someone like me is left with the job of cutting through all the wrong answers that build on a question over the centuries.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I am really pleased that you enjoyed it!! Thank you. Ha, yes and the official propaganda of earlier times is now dangerously fogged with the sensational fantasies of recent years.
      The Lazarists are an interesting bunch as they might actually have been the very first military-religious order. It still surprises me how many of these bodies there were in the 12th & 13th centuries!
      Agreed! It does make you wonder what the future will make of us haha 😉

      Liked by 2 people

  4. I must say I am very much surprised to learn they had such a terrible reputation but was yet glorified. I had no idea they had another name. Red Monks.

    I read some of the accusations and find them too similar to many of the same accusations leveled at others. I have read about many others who were demonized in this same way shortly before execution, during this era. Demonizing a person or organization was a sure way of gaining public’s support for the atrocity being committed against them.
    I’m not saying the guys were saints or sinner, I do not know, but I can see where they were used to carry out the ill wills of others and when they grew too popular among the common people, too wealthy and strong that’s when they became a problem or a threat.

    I know you are repeating the accounts left behind by those of who lived back then but I’m curious about the contradicting accounts of them. Which is true?

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Agreed, it is sad but true that then, as now, spreading fear and misinformation to demonise a person/group was a well used tactic.
      I have not read anything to suggest whether they were popular or not in their communities. As you’d expect, contemporary sources were written to either praise or damn the order. We will never be certain but it is likely that, as with any large body of men, attitudes were mixed towards them. Perhaps there were small grains of truth behind the legends which were embellished over time. Maybe the villains of the earliest stories were a different group entirely. If so, it’s interesting that they eventually settled on the Templars hundreds of years after their disappearance!

      Liked by 2 people

      1. I have wondered what caused their popularity? That was over seven hundred years ago and why does their popularity still exist today? The execution date of the first group of knights Friday, October 13, 1307. I’ve wondered why did the common people help some escape and according to folk lores, help them make it all the way to North American nearing two hundred years before Columbus. What’s recorded about them today. I don’t know if it was written during their life time or afterward. Most of what the world knows about them comes from the hometown of Hugues de Payens, the Founder of the Knights Templar and some of the other head knights.

        I agree with the grain of truth because usually for something to have such a long lasting legacy there is some truth to the folk lores about them.

        For example, Tomás de Torquemada is well known, but there’s nothing good said about him by the common people.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. A few histories of the order were produced in the early 19thC and that seems to have shone the first modern lights on an order that had been lost to time for centuries. In the 20thC, various folks popped out of the woodwork of France to proclaim themselves inheritors of the Templars. A few books that roped together disparate bits of mythology around the Templars did the rest 😉 And everyone loves a good conspiracy theory!
        The Friday the 13th being unlucky is sometimes associated with the Templars but those folks ignore the fact that such an association in relatively recent. As to the idea of them travelling to America, no one seems to have answered – how? The ships the order had were coastal traders – unlikely to survive an Atlantic crossing. They would likely have had little room as the holds would have needed to be full of drinking water 😉
        I’ve not head of any commoners helping them to escape trial. These were knights from wealthy and powerful families. In almost all cases the charges of heresy were unproved. The few score that were executed were held to have relapsed. Whether they did or not, who knows.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. I don’t know either, did they or did they not make it to North America. I don’t know if it all is a hoax. The land would have not been called North America back then. There are two places in North America where they supposedly landed; Newfoundland and Florida, there are monuments bearing their symbols. Who put them there? I don’t know. The native people say these people, we call Templar Knights came and lived among them. Is the Native people’s oral history correct. I don’t know. I try not o dispute other people’s cultural history.

        According to the Native story they sailed out of Norway not France. The Vikings having been here before was supposedly help with their navigation. There has been discovered Viking and Egyptian relics in North America meaning they both beat Columbus here, The knights Templar was supposedly on the north continent in 1362.

        The Knights Templar, full name was The United Religious, Military and Masonic Orders of the Temple and of St John of Jerusalem, Palestine, Rhodes and Malta, is a fraternal order affiliated with The Freemasonry. According to some, it was the Masons who employed their Viking brothers are who alleged help some escaped. [The masons have members in every culture] It was well known that some people did not like the Templar Order, such as Emperor Frederick II of the Holy Roman Empire, the Templars were the stuff of great legend even to the people in their times. … that’s perhaps how they became popular but it doesn’t explain how they remained popular. In short, many people didn’t believe the Templars were bad, but their reputation of legend makes them a topic of mystery.

        After their arrest and torture, within weeks of their confessions, many of Templars recanted their confessions, and Clement shut down the inquisition trials. It said The Templars lingered in their cells for two years before Philip had more than 50 of the them burned at the stake in 1307. You can find names such as Afonso I of Portugal, also known as Afonso Henriques who were not French among the names of the knights who were not French.

        If it is true or not other orders existed in six other nations, I don’t know. Now, the most confusing thing about this Afonso I of Portugal, is I finds two accounts by the same name. But the years are so far apart they can’t possible be the same person.
        Yes, there’s’ a lot mystery about them as to why they maybe interesting. I conclude they are a group of people we may never know the full truth about. 🙂

        Liked by 3 people

      4. Yes, agreed, there is a lot of fanciful speculation about. I had not heard the Norwegian angle before. Indeed, I did not think the Templars ever had a presence in Scandinavia. I didn’t even think the Teutonic Knights did.

        Liked by 1 person

      5. Perhaps so, a lot of their mystery is because they are a branch of the Mason. I didn’t realize the Teuton Knight were once a branch of the Templars. The Teutonic Order’s proper name is The Order of the Hospital of St. Mary of the Germans in Jerusalem. When the Order Militarized it modeled itself on the Templars. So the Teutonic Knights are basically what was left of the Germans who left the Knights Templar after the 3rd crusade?

        Liked by 2 people

      6. I believe the Teutonic Knights were a quite separate order to the Templars, just as the Hospitallers, Lazarists etc. It had many of the same precepts as the Templars but in many ways was a stricter order with more rules regarding fraternising with those outside the order etc.
        As to whether there was any link between masons and Templars – who knows? When freemasonry outed itself, there was a flutter of evangelical 18thC masons claiming a direct line to the Templars but there is absolutely no proof of that and many Grand Lodges have rejected the notion.

        Liked by 1 person

      7. Oh ok, So the Teuton were never a part of the Templar. From what I understand even if they were a branch of the Freemasons, the Freemasons would never tell it nor speak to anyone about their Masonic degrees, branches nor their secret rituals. Although the Freemasons are the keepers of many nations’ secrets they are also a group with convenience amnesia. LOL!

        Liked by 1 person

      8. I haven’t read that one yet. But after checking it out—Well, I’m quite certain Christ died on the cross. It were the ancient Romans doing the crucifying. They wasn’t about to let him go free. They loved pain and bloodletting too much. Nah, they killed him unless he burst them back with Glory.

        Liked by 1 person

      9. It’s worth a scan – Christ and Mary Magdalene, a Messianic bloodline, hidden knowledge protected by the Masons, secrets discovered by the Templars, shadowy organisations trying to run the world – it’s all there haha

        Liked by 1 person

      10. Now, come to think of it. I have heard of the book but never read it. I have heard the marriage between Jesus and Mary Magdalene is where gifted people come from, not Pentecost. I won’t dispute there are shadowy organizations trying to run the world. There always have been, but I seriously doubt any of it has anything to do with Jesus. Had the early persecutors of Christians been able to find this they would have had a field day with it. This is the exact kind of thing they were looking for to discredit Jesus of Nazareth and had it existed they would have had no problem sowing it from Jerusalem to Rome.

        Liked by 1 person

      11. I haven’t read Mr. Dunn’s book .I just looked at the case. I know what the final ruling was but I think Mr. Brown needed to have reworded what he was writing. If Mr. Dunn claim was true, then he had a point. You can write about the same subject as another author but not ‘exactly’ how someone else wrote it. You have to put it in your own style, use your own descriptions, and string together your own wording.

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Wow Collin….you’re writing as usual is marvellous. The data that you manage to fit in is so mind boggling. ….your writing is an epitome of perfection and grace…..so enjoyable to read and be inspired too….🙏🏼🤩🙏🏼

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Excellent post, Colin! Such impressive research (as in all your posts!) I’ve read about the Templars and Freemasons (The Hiram Key and The Templar Revelation) but I wasn’t familiar with their presence in Brittany. The more we learn, the more mysteries we discover. 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you very much!! I am happy that you liked it 🙂 Yes, ever since The Holy Blood & Holy Grail, there has been a massive amount written about them hehe. Coincidentally, I have read both those books 😉 Stay Well! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Another interesting post. I’ve always had a vague notion of who the Templars were, unclear whether they were valiant or evil. As is so often the case, I guess it depends on one’s perspective. I had no idea they were linked to Brittany.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I am glad that you liked the read!! Thank you for taking the time to do so 😉
      Yes, you are right, like anything, it’s mainly subjective and like any organisation, I’m sure it had genuine devout members as well as those who were there to simply further their own interests. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

    1. You are most welcome! I am pleased that you enjoyed the read. While there are not as many surviving buildings here as in other parts of France (thanks to time and the ravages of the War of Breton Succession and the War of the League), they once had a big presence here. Stay well!!

      Like

  8. Another great post! What do you suppose gave rise in the 19th/20th c folk belief concerning the evils of the Knights Templar?

    The tale of the Three Red Monks _somewhat_ resembles the other Breton tale about Saint Tryphine and Conomor. I can’t wait to crack open Le Grand’s work after I’m done with the ‘sunken city’ type tale in Celtic. Thanks once more for providing me with it! I WILL get to these things!

    Happy New Year, Bon! I can’t wait for all the exciting articles you have in store for us!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you very much! I am happy that you liked it. 🙂
      I think it’s difficult to ascribe the reasons behind their evil reputation. There was simply virtually nothing written about them here until the 17thC.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website at WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: